When debt collectors cross the line from persistence to harassment, consumers have the right to fight back, and both federal and state laws are on their side. In Florida, those rights are protected by federal law and a powerful state law known as the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA).
While many people are familiar with the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which sets the standard at the national level, the FCCPA offers an additional layer of protection, often going even further to hold collectors accountable.
Understanding how these two statutes interact is essential for both consumers and creditors involved in debt-related disputes. This article examines the key distinctions between the FCCPA and the FDCPA, outlines the most common allegations brought under the FCCPA, and explores the legal implications of violating its provisions.
The FDCPA is a federal law enacted in 1977 to protect consumers across the United States from abusive, unfair, or deceptive practices by third-party debt collectors. It is codified in 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692–1692p and enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
It does not apply to business debts.
As of early 2025, the CFPB reports:
These figures reflect the growing efforts to hold debt collectors accountable on a national scale.
While the FDCPA provides a strong framework of protection at the national level, Florida has enacted its own statute to supplement and, in some cases, strengthen consumer rights.
The FCCPA is a state law enacted to protect Florida residents from abusive, deceptive, or unfair debt collection practices. Found in Florida Statutes §§ 559.55–559.785, the FCCPA is similar to the federal FDCPA, but it goes further in several important ways.
In some cases, injunctive relief to stop unlawful practices
Effective July 1, 2025, Florida’s CS/SB 232 amends the FCCPA to explicitly permit debt collectors to contact consumers via email between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. but only if the consumer consents. This change clarifies the scope of permissible digital communications and aims to reduce litigation over time-restricted contacts.
This legislative update reflects the FCCPA's adaptability to modern communication methods and consumer preferences.
Given their overlap in purpose and protections, it's important to understand how the FCCPA and FDCPA align and where they diverge.
Also Read: Understanding Debt Collection Practices and Laws in Florida
While they operate at different jurisdictional levels, the FCCPA and FDCPA share several foundational principles. Both laws aim to:
These similarities allow plaintiffs in Florida to bring claims under both statutes simultaneously, increasing their chances of recovery and strengthening consumer protection.
Despite their shared mission, key differences between the two laws can significantly affect how claims are brought and defended in litigation.
Despite their shared goals, the FCCPA and FDCPA differ in several ways, such as:
These distinctions become especially relevant in litigation, where understanding the nature of the alleged violation is key to determining which statute applies.
Also Read: History and Amendments of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and FCRA
Lawsuits involving FCCPA violations often involve allegations such as:
Such allegations are on the rise. In 2024 alone, regulators initiated 16 enforcement actions related to debt collection, 9 federal, 5 state-level, and 2 joint efforts, highlighting ongoing consumer protection concerns.
To protect consumers effectively, the FCCPA explicitly lists certain prohibited actions that often form the basis of these allegations.
The FCCPA lists specific practices that are unlawful, including:
When collectors violate these rules, they open themselves up to substantial legal risk under Florida law.
Also Read: Common FDCPA Violations and Unfair Practices by Debt Collectors
Violators of the FCCPA can face serious consequences, including:
Because of the broader application of FCCPA, original creditors collecting in bad faith face liability that would not exist under FDCPA alone.
As of January 2025, the CFPB increased civil money penalties due to inflation:
These penalty adjustments reinforce the seriousness of noncompliance.
However, not all FCCPA claims result in success—defendants can assert various legal defenses that may weaken or defeat a case.
Debt collectors and creditors facing FCCPA claims may assert several defenses:
As the legal landscape continues to evolve, a clear understanding of consumer rights and potential liabilities remains essential.
FCCPA violations are a serious legal matter with broad implications for both consumers and creditors. While the FCCPA aligns with the FDCPA in its goal of preventing unfair debt collection, it expands protections by applying to original creditors and Florida-specific situations.
As recent updates and enforcement data show, regulatory scrutiny is high in 2025. Understanding the distinctions, prohibited conduct, and typical allegations involved in FCCPA litigation can help individuals recognize when their rights are being violated and empower them to take appropriate legal action.
For those facing aggressive or deceptive collection efforts, consulting with a consumer rights attorney familiar with both federal and Florida laws is often the best course of action.
If you believe a debt collector has crossed the line, you don’t have to face it alone. At Southeast Client Services Inc., we specialize in identifying FCCPA violations and helping Florida consumers take back control. Whether you’re dealing with harassing calls, false claims, or unlawful threats, our team is here to help you hold collectors accountable.
Contact us today and let’s put a stop to unfair collection practices together.